Design

Building AI agents for repetitive tasks

AI agents are configured with roles, tools, and boundaries to handle repetitive tasks, giving the designer hands-on experience shaping behavior and learning from failures and edge cases.

Why the human is still essential here

A human must choose the task, define the agent’s limits, evaluate failures, and refine the workflow so automation supports users instead of acting unchecked.

How people use this

Research insight tagging agent

An agent reviews raw interview notes or transcripts, tags themes like pain points and feature requests, and saves structured summaries for the design team to review.

n8n / OpenAI

Design QA triage agent

An agent checks incoming bug reports or staging feedback, groups duplicates, and routes likely UX issues to the right designer with human approval.

Zapier / OpenAI

Component doc drafting agent

An agent turns scattered design decisions into first-pass component notes, usage guidance, and edge-case reminders for the design systems team to refine.

Make / Anthropic Claude

Need Help Implementing AI in Your Organization?

I help companies navigate AI adoption -- from strategy to production. Whether you are building your first LLM-powered feature or scaling an agentic system, I can help you get it right.

LLM Orchestration

Design and build LLM-powered products and agentic systems

AI Strategy

Go from idea to production with a clear implementation roadmap

Compliance & Safety

Build AI with human-in-the-loop in regulated environments

Related Prompts (4)

Latest community stories (1)

Personal Story
Medium

From Pixels to Prompts: My Journey from UX Designer to AI Product Designer

For years, my job had a shape I could describe in one breath: understand the user, sketch the flow, wireframe the screens, polish the pixels, hand off to engineering. It was a craft built on control. I decided where the button went. I decided what happened when you tapped it. Every state was mine to design.

Then AI started showing up in the products I was designing for, not as a feature bolted onto a screen, but as the thing generating the screen’s content, sometimes even deciding what the screen should be in the first place. And I noticed something uncomfortable: my usual toolkit didn’t quite fit anymore.


A few shifts have already started rewiring how I approach design work:


From screens to systems. I used to think in flows and states. Now I’m learning to think in inputs, prompts, guardrails, and fallback behaviors, designing for a system that has a personality and a failure mode, not just a layout.


The biggest unlock, though, has been learning to actually build, not just design on top of what engineers hand me. Through the bootcamp, I got hands-on with creating AI agents for the first time, figuring out how to give a model a role, a set of tools, and boundaries for what it should and shouldn’t do on its own. It’s a strange feeling, designing behavior instead of designing a screen.


I also started using Cursor and Claude Code, and that alone shifted something in how I see myself.


I’m not a developer, and I’m still not pretending to be one, but being able to prototype an idea in code instead of just Figma to see an actual working flow instead of a static mockup has changed how fast I can test whether an idea is even worth pursuing.

CG
Chitra GohadUX Designer
Jul 23, 2026