Design

Critiquing and improving AI-generated design outputs

AI generates polished design suggestions quickly, and the designer uses critique and iteration to identify weak outputs, rewrite them, and improve the result.

Why the human is still essential here

Human judgment, taste, and experience are required to recognize when AI output misses the point and decide how it should be improved.

How people use this

AI wireframe review

AI generates an initial app screen or wireframe, and the designer critiques the layout, hierarchy, and usability issues before refining it into a stronger solution.

Figma AI / Uizard

UX copy refinement

AI drafts onboarding, empty-state, or error-message copy, and the designer rewrites anything that feels generic, misleading, or off-brand.

ChatGPT / Claude

Design system component cleanup

AI suggests component variants or content updates inside a design file, and the designer checks consistency, accessibility, and fit with the design system before keeping them.

Figma AI

Need Help Implementing AI in Your Organization?

I help companies navigate AI adoption -- from strategy to production. Whether you are building your first LLM-powered feature or scaling an agentic system, I can help you get it right.

LLM Orchestration

Design and build LLM-powered products and agentic systems

AI Strategy

Go from idea to production with a clear implementation roadmap

Compliance & Safety

Build AI with human-in-the-loop in regulated environments

Related Prompts (4)

Latest community stories (1)

Personal Story
LinkedIn

Okay, here’s something I didn’t expect…

Okay, here’s something I didn’t expect…

AI isn’t reducing the need for designers.

It’s exposing the gap between them.


For a long time, being “good” at design meant:

- Clean UI

- Knowing Figma

- Following patterns


That was enough.

Now... AI can already do that.

And honestly… sometimes faster than we can.


But here’s where it gets interesting.

AI doesn’t know when it’s wrong, it gives you something that looks right, feels right, sounds right. Until it isn’t.


And that’s the moment where the real skill shows up. Not in how good you are at using tools, but in whether you can say:

“This is not good enough.”

“This misses the point.”

“This is what it should be instead.”


That takes:

- Judgment

- Taste

- Experience

- A point of view


Not just execution.


I’ve started noticing this in my own work.

The hardest part is no longer creating something.

It’s deciding what should be created.


So next time AI gives you a polished answer…

Don’t accept it immediately. Push back, rewrite it, make it better, then push back some more.


I noticed that the juiciest answers always come after 1-2 hours of discussion and rabbit-hole exploration with the models.


AI is a tool. Use it.

But design is still strategy, judgment, iteration, and craft.

AM
Aleksandar MasicUI / UX Designer - Design System
May 4, 2026