Design

Generating wireframes from real product HTML

The wireframing step uses approved information architecture plus captured HTML from the real product to create grayscale wireframes by editing an existing page structure instead of inventing a layout from scratch.

Why the human is still essential here

Designers still evaluate whether the structure, priorities, and iterations are right for the product; AI accelerates production, but human taste and product judgment determine the final direction.

How people use this

Legacy dashboard wireframes

AI uses captured HTML from an existing dashboard to create grayscale wireframes that preserve current layout constraints while exploring cleaner hierarchy.

Anima / Figma AI

Checkout page restructuring

Approved IA and live checkout HTML are used to generate low-fidelity wireframes that test a simpler page flow without rebuilding the screen from scratch.

v0 / Figma AI

Settings screen simplification

AI edits imported HTML from a settings page into wireframe variants so the designer can compare clearer grouping and navigation options quickly.

Builder.io / Figma AI

Need Help Implementing AI in Your Organization?

I help companies navigate AI adoption -- from strategy to production. Whether you are building your first LLM-powered feature or scaling an agentic system, I can help you get it right.

LLM Orchestration

Design and build LLM-powered products and agentic systems

AI Strategy

Go from idea to production with a clear implementation roadmap

Compliance & Safety

Build AI with human-in-the-loop in regulated environments

Related Prompts (4)

Latest community stories (1)

Personal Story
Blog

I turned my design process into a dozen small skills, not one giant prompt

The first version of my design workflow was one enormous prompt. Thousands of words describing every step of how we design. I was pretty proud of it. It held together for about three steps and then quietly fell apart.

Not with an error. It failed the way a big prompt always does. The model lost the thread halfway down, blended two steps into one, skipped the one in the middle, and handed me something that looked like process but wasn't. And I couldn't fix it, because touching one part broke three others. One block of text, no seams.


The deeper problem was worse than maintenance. A single prompt gave the AI nowhere to stop. It ran from requirements straight to a prototype in one breath, sailing past every point where a human should have said "wait." It was automating the exact thing I'd promised to keep human.


Think of it as a team, not a prompt


The fix was to stop treating it as a prompt and start treating it as a team. A team isn't one person holding the whole job in their head. It's small roles with clear handoffs, and a check before the next person picks it up.

PS
Prateek SinghSenior Product Designer
Aug 7, 2026