Automating repetitive recruiting admin, screening coordination, interview scheduling, candidate follow-up, workflow actions, and hiring documentation

One consequential development in executive search this week:

On August 18, hireEZ announced that it rebuilt its recruiting platform around AI agents. Beginning August 27, the system is designed to execute research, sourcing, screening, outreach, scheduling, and ATS updates while recruiters retain approval and decision authority.

This is more than another AI sourcing feature. It signals a shift from automating isolated tasks to automating much of the recruiting workflow.

What does that mean for executive search?

Technology-enabled research is quickly becoming standard. Finding candidates faster will no longer be enough to differentiate a search firm. The greater value lies in defining the leadership mandate, evaluating evidence, understanding organizational context, and advising clients through a consequential decision.

AI can execute a recruiting workflow. Puvro, Inc. provides the judgment required to make a consequential leadership decision.

Source: https://lnkd.in/g7gKCrYN

#ExecutiveSearch #LeadershipRecruiting #ArtificialIntelligence

hireEZ rebuilds its entire platform on agents. What your best recruiter knows, your whole team gets. The boring half of the job disappears, and the hunt and the close come back. See it live on stage at SpeakEZ Summit on August 27.

Recruiting has survived every major change in how people work. AI will be no different.

I was thinking about this recently because there is a lot of noise around AI and what it is going to “replace.”

Recruiting, in one form or another, has existed for centuries. Since then, think about how much has changed:

🔹 Industrialization changed where and how people worked.
🔹 Wars and recessions reshaped entire labor markets.
🔹 The telephone changed how we connected with candidates.
🔹 Computers changed how we managed information.
🔹 The internet and job boards changed how people found jobs.
🔹 ATS platforms changed how we managed hiring.
🔹 LinkedIn and social media completely changed sourcing and networking.

👽And now we have AI.

Every one of those changes forced recruiters to evolve. But none removed the need to understand a requirement, identify talent, assess fit, build trust, and connect people with opportunity.

I don’t think AI is going to collapse recruiting. I think it is going to raise the standard.

AI can help us search larger populations, research faster, prepare better, identify things we may have missed, personalize communication, and eliminate hours of repetitive work.

That should give recruiters MORE time for the part of this profession that matters most: people.

🛑But there is an important distinction.

AI does not automatically make someone better at their job. You still need experience, judgment, curiosity, and critical thinking. You need to know when to trust the output and, more importantly, when to challenge it.

💡 AI should amplify your capability, not replace your thinking.

That is where I believe the real divide is coming.

It won’t simply be AI vs. people.

It will be professionals who learn how to leverage AI versus those who refuse to evolve with it.

And that goes well beyond recruiting.

AI may not replace you. But someone who understands your profession AND knows how to leverage AI may eventually outpace you.

Technology has always changed the way we work.

The opportunity is learning how to change with it.

👇 I’m curious: How are you using AI in your day-to-day, professionally or personally? What has actually made you better or more efficient?

#ArtificialIntelligence #Recruiting #TalentAcquisition #Leadership #FutureOfWork

AI can find a résumé. But can it recognize the right person?

That’s one of the biggest questions I see facing the staffing world right now.

AI is changing recruiting at an incredible pace. We can source faster, screen larger talent pools, automate outreach, and uncover candidates we may never have found through a traditional search.

And yet, finding great talent hasn’t necessarily gotten easier.

Because hiring isn’t simply about matching keywords to a job description.
It’s understanding the person behind the résumé.

How will they lead?

How will they communicate when things get difficult?

Will they complement the existing team?

Does the opportunity align with what they actually want next in their career?
Those are conversations—not algorithms.

I believe the strongest recruiters of the future will absolutely embrace AI. But we’ll use it to create more time for the human side of recruiting, not less.
Technology can help us identify talent.

Relationships, judgment, and trust help us build teams.
And in a world becoming increasingly automated, I believe that human connection may become our greatest competitive advantage.

What are you seeing right now—has AI made hiring easier, or simply faster?
#Staffing #Recruiting #TalentAcquisition #Hiring #AIinRecruiting #Leadership #FutureOfWork #PeopleMatter

Insert fall headshot pic because this Arizona heat is getting to me! Happy Friday all! 💞

A large iCIMS instance accumulates candidates faster than any TA team can phone them. JobTalk AI runs the first structured screen on the ones you scope to it, so recruiter time goes to the shortlist rather than to dialling.

I use AI every day at work and every night "vibe coding" haha. Here's my honest scorecard on what it's actually good at in recruiting:

Genuinely great:
- First-draft job descriptions (I edit, but it kills the blank page)
- Researching a company before a BD call
- Turning a long candidate call into clean notes

Overrated:
- Outreach. AI-written InMails have a smell. Candidates can tell, imo. Everyone's inbox is full of the same "personalized at scale" robot chatter.

Completely irreplaceable:
-The call where a candidate tells you the real reason they're leaving, which is never the reason on their resume.

The recruiters who win the next 5 years won't be the ones who automate the most. They'll be the ones who automate the busywork so they can spend more hours on the phone.

What's AI actually doing for you at work? Not the hype version. The real one.

#ad Most tools help you do one thing better.

RPS+ with LinkedIn Hiring Assistant transforms sourcing, productivity AND business development for staffing firms at the same time.

1.3 billion members. Real-time talent signals. AI that never acts without recruiter permission. End to end workflow built specifically for staffing.

The firms that win in 2026 won't just have great recruiters. They'll have great tech behind them.

Discover RPS+ with Hiring Assistant — your AI-powered edge in staffing. Try it today.

https://lnkd.in/eGa2GyVj

LinkedIn Talent Solutions #LinkedInHiringAssistant | #LinkedInPartner

AI can betray you, and I just watched it happen live, costing someone a job, mid-interview.

A candidate with a strong CV, solid experience, and a commendable educational background was shortlisted from hundreds of applicants. She didn’t need shortcuts; she was qualified enough.

From the first answer, something felt off. Her responses seemed overly scripted and monotone...My Recruiter instinct radar was pinging away. Then, suddenly, her AI prompt began speaking out loud mid-interview. She panicked, and I genuinely felt for her.

Let me clarify: this is not an anti-AI post. Far from it. Every role I hire for requires candidates who already use AI in their workflows and some form of AI expertise is now essential in almost every role, but for the right reasons...not to replace personal competence.

I use AI daily, but I monitor it closely. I use notetakers to stay fully present with candidates during my interviews. I use AI to shape content for better flow. I frequently see AI-generated CVs, and when used well, they can look well organised and sharp. This is the reality we operate in now. However, your experience should be authentic. Your voice in these conversations should be your own.

An interview is not a speech, it’s a conversation about what/how/why you’ve done, you’re doing, you can do. I love it when mid interview candidates feel empowered to pause and say, "Tam, can I take a moment to gather my thoughts?" That’s confidence, self-awareness and leadership potential. If you need a moment, take it.

If you’re worried about forgetting key points, go back to basics. Use Post-its as prompts; many leave interviews thinking, "I wish I’d mentioned that!". Just remember that there will be no such thing as a perfect interview, you will always leave feeling like you missed something.

However In this case, the candidate felt she found the solution, for a perfect interview, but her AI prompt exposed her. Even if your AI remains silent, your interviewer will notice. Recruiters are scanning for red flags because our clients trust our instincts. If something feels off or misaligned, most won’t dig deeper; they’ll simply move on to the next applicant.

The bigger question is: if you secure a role based on answers that aren’t yours, what happens when you’re expected to deliver day-to-day? Use an earpiece?

Embrace AI (I do), it's amazing...but don’t let it be your voice in an interview or conversation.

Good luck to all those interviewing this week 🤞
Tam Dost at Talent Hunters

I just got a phone call from an AI recruiter bot.

As someone who uses AI daily, I was shocked!

I love tech. I use AI to help source candidates. I use it to write client screens. I even use it to transcribe virtual calls with candidate approval. (I even created this image with AI).

But talking to a bot on the phone felt wrong. It felt like a data-harvesting scam. It lacked any shred of security. Most of all, it lacked humanity.

Call me old-fashioned, but finding a job requires a human touch.
Hiring is built on trust. You cannot build a relationship with an algorithm. I want real partnerships with my clients, recruiters, and candidates.

Automation should enhance our work, not replace our relationships.
Am I alone here?

Should recruiters use AI? Yes (with caveats).

But all the AI and tooling in the world doesn't change the fundamentals. AI doesn't make a bad process good. It makes it fast. And a bad process at scale is the worst version of hiring there is. Point it at a structured, consistent one, and it helps run that process for every candidate. Not speed. Not cleverness. Consistency.

A few things I believe after building this into a real talent function:

▪️ The recruiter stays at the centre. AI can make you faster and better informed. The human still makes the call and owns the outcome.

▪️ The constraint isn't which model is smartest. It's whether it can see the whole hiring story. Scatter it across email, Slack, and half-filled ATS notes, and your AI only ever reasons about the easy half.

▪️ Hiring is two kinds of work. Predictable work you automate. Judgment work AI assists with, but never decides.

▪️ The resume is an even weaker signal now. Both sides have the same tools. That's not a crisis, it's a forcing function for skills-based hiring. It strips away the lazy proxies and rewards the teams who already knew what "good" looks like and built a process to test for it.

I just hosted the first episode of the Pinpoint How-To Series on exactly this.

I walk through the five areas where this changed how I work: intake and role design, candidate management, recruiting content, reporting and insights, and interview prep.

It's 20 minutes, practical, and I share the three red lines I won't cross. Link in the comments.