Legal

Drafting and structuring litigation filings

AI helps a self-represented litigant draft complaint sections, organize allegations, and structure filings to match pleading requirements and legal elements.

Why the human is still essential here

The human litigant reads the statutes, studies procedure, decides the claims, and exercises judgment about what to file. AI supports production work but does not make legal decisions.

How people use this

Complaint section first drafts

AI turns notes, statutes, and target causes of action into a first-pass section of a complaint that the litigant rewrites and verifies.

ChatGPT / Claude

Cause-of-action pleading outlines

AI maps the required elements of each claim into an ordered allegation outline so filings follow a court-ready structure.

CoCounsel Legal / Lexis+ AI

Defined-term and filing cleanup

AI checks a draft pleading for inconsistent defined terms, duplicated facts, and awkward transitions before filing.

Harvey / Claude

Related Prompts (2)

Community stories (1)

X

I'm Using AI to Sue 7 Defendants in 3 Courts for $850 Million. Here's How.

What happened is closer to this: I spent hundreds of hours reading federal civil procedure. I read the statutes I was suing under. I read the case law on pleading standards. I went on PACER and just started buying and reading dockets. I used that to have AI help me understand of what a complaint needs to say, and why, and in what order.

Then I used AI the way a lawyer uses a team of associates.


Draft this section. Cross-reference these defined terms. Check whether this allegation satisfies this element of this cause of action. Flag internal inconsistencies across these six documents. Hold the entire case in memory while I think about what comes next.


The AI didn't practice law. I practiced law, badly at first and then less badly, using AI to do the production work that would have otherwise required a team I could not afford.

JB
Jay BallentinePlaintiff, pro se
Mar 13, 2026